<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 341 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236908</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision, ruling that the construction of dry latrines under a contract with DUDA did not qualify as a charitable purpose under Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the activities were in the nature of trade, commerce, or business and involved consideration, thus falling outside the scope of charitable activities. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was dismissed, affirming the denial of registration under Section 12AA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 341 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236908</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision, ruling that the construction of dry latrines under a contract with DUDA did not qualify as a charitable purpose under Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the activities were in the nature of trade, commerce, or business and involved consideration, thus falling outside the scope of charitable activities. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was dismissed, affirming the denial of registration under Section 12AA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>