<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 329 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order confirming the penalty imposed by the AO under section 271(1)(c) for the addition made on account of long-term capital gains. The appeal was dismissed as the assessee failed to demonstrate that the mistake in claiming exemption under section 10(38) was genuine and bonafide, and had not fully disclosed all relevant facts. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposition was justified in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 329 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order confirming the penalty imposed by the AO under section 271(1)(c) for the addition made on account of long-term capital gains. The appeal was dismissed as the assessee failed to demonstrate that the mistake in claiming exemption under section 10(38) was genuine and bonafide, and had not fully disclosed all relevant facts. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposition was justified in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>