https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236892 The appeal was allowed as the appellant was deemed eligible for CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on services received, despite invoices being in the name of their head office. The non-endorsement of invoices in the head office's name was considered a curable defect, given no dispute on service receipt and tax payment. Citing a prior case, the decision favored the appellant, leading to the overturning of the initial order that denied the credit. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236892 The appeal was allowed as the appellant was deemed eligible for CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on services received, despite invoices being in the name of their head office. The non-endorsement of invoices in the head office's name was considered a curable defect, given no dispute on service receipt and tax payment. Citing a prior case, the decision favored the appellant, leading to the overturning of the initial order that denied the credit. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236892