<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 315 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision was based on the lack of corroborative evidence, the insufficiency of retracted statements obtained under alleged coercion, and the confirmation of demand without proper disclosure, violating principles of natural justice. The allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of goods without payment of Central Excise duty were not conclusively established, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 315 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision was based on the lack of corroborative evidence, the insufficiency of retracted statements obtained under alleged coercion, and the confirmation of demand without proper disclosure, violating principles of natural justice. The allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of goods without payment of Central Excise duty were not conclusively established, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>