<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 313 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236880</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, ruling that the appellant&#039;s failure to fully pay duty in March 2008 constituted a default, restricting CENVAT credit use. The appellant was required to pay the equivalent duty from PLA with interest before recrediting the irregularly utilized CENVAT amount. The appeal was rejected, emphasizing the importance of timely and accurate duty payments to comply with excise regulations and avoid penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:58:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 313 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236880</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, ruling that the appellant&#039;s failure to fully pay duty in March 2008 constituted a default, restricting CENVAT credit use. The appellant was required to pay the equivalent duty from PLA with interest before recrediting the irregularly utilized CENVAT amount. The appeal was rejected, emphasizing the importance of timely and accurate duty payments to comply with excise regulations and avoid penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>