<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 296 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236863</link>
    <description>The appeal for the assessment year 2007-08 was dismissed as infructuous due to the withdrawal of the impugned order by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. For the assessment year 2008-09, the appeal was partly allowed. The tribunal directed the exclusion of specific expenditures from both export and total turnover and granted deductions under section 10A on the enhanced income resulting from the disallowance under section 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 06:33:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 296 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236863</link>
      <description>The appeal for the assessment year 2007-08 was dismissed as infructuous due to the withdrawal of the impugned order by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. For the assessment year 2008-09, the appeal was partly allowed. The tribunal directed the exclusion of specific expenditures from both export and total turnover and granted deductions under section 10A on the enhanced income resulting from the disallowance under section 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>