<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 291 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236858</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh examination. The Tribunal directed the authority to provide a comprehensive analysis of each contention raised by the appellant and to issue a speaking order. Additionally, the Tribunal granted a waiver from pre-deposit of the dues adjudged in the impugned order due to the remand. The stay application was also disposed of in light of the remand decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 291 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236858</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh examination. The Tribunal directed the authority to provide a comprehensive analysis of each contention raised by the appellant and to issue a speaking order. Additionally, the Tribunal granted a waiver from pre-deposit of the dues adjudged in the impugned order due to the remand. The stay application was also disposed of in light of the remand decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>