<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 285 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236852</link>
    <description>Conversion of shipping bills from DFRC to DEPB was treated as permissible where the delay was satisfactorily explained, including loss of shipping bills, lodging of an FIR, and filing the request after the documents were traced. The circular&#039;s time limit was not treated as fatal, and a record-based mismatch in shipping bill numbers was rejected. The request also could not be denied on unsubstantiated allegations of fraud or misdeclaration, because the cancellation order did not establish fraud as alleged and the exported goods were verifiable from the shipping bills and existing records. A liberal approach was applied to the export incentive scheme, and conversion was directed to be allowed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 285 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236852</link>
      <description>Conversion of shipping bills from DFRC to DEPB was treated as permissible where the delay was satisfactorily explained, including loss of shipping bills, lodging of an FIR, and filing the request after the documents were traced. The circular&#039;s time limit was not treated as fatal, and a record-based mismatch in shipping bill numbers was rejected. The request also could not be denied on unsubstantiated allegations of fraud or misdeclaration, because the cancellation order did not establish fraud as alleged and the exported goods were verifiable from the shipping bills and existing records. A liberal approach was applied to the export incentive scheme, and conversion was directed to be allowed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>