<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 270 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of assessment, finding it invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of independent application of mind and reliance solely on audit objections. The Tribunal held that reopening based on audit objections without independent assessment is not valid, citing legal precedents. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 270 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of assessment, finding it invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of independent application of mind and reliance solely on audit objections. The Tribunal held that reopening based on audit objections without independent assessment is not valid, citing legal precedents. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>