<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 266 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It directed adjustments in the Transfer Pricing analysis, including verifying indirect costs and excluding notional interest. Depreciation on Ankleshwar Plant assets was allowed, and income from sub-leasing of property was to be taxed as house property income. The issue regarding interest under Section 234D was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 266 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal. It directed adjustments in the Transfer Pricing analysis, including verifying indirect costs and excluding notional interest. Depreciation on Ankleshwar Plant assets was allowed, and income from sub-leasing of property was to be taxed as house property income. The issue regarding interest under Section 234D was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>