<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 260 - BOMBAY  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236827</link>
    <description>The Court modified the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, reducing the pre-deposit amount from Rs.89 lakhs to Rs.45 lakhs for an appellant challenging tax recovery. The appellant, a freight forwarding agency, disputed liability for service tax on cargo space trading. Despite a tax demand of Rs.2.75 crores, the Court found the reduced pre-deposit reasonable, considering a similar Chennai case. An extension was granted for deposit due to liquidity issues, allowing the appellant to stay recovery pending further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 260 - BOMBAY  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236827</link>
      <description>The Court modified the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, reducing the pre-deposit amount from Rs.89 lakhs to Rs.45 lakhs for an appellant challenging tax recovery. The appellant, a freight forwarding agency, disputed liability for service tax on cargo space trading. Despite a tax demand of Rs.2.75 crores, the Court found the reduced pre-deposit reasonable, considering a similar Chennai case. An extension was granted for deposit due to liquidity issues, allowing the appellant to stay recovery pending further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>