https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236819 The court dismissed the notice of motion filed by the plaintiff as they failed to prove that the properties and businesses in question were joint Hindu family properties. The plaintiff could not establish a sufficient joint family nucleus for acquiring the properties or demonstrate that the businesses were initiated with joint family funds. Additionally, the plaintiff's claim for a 1/10th share lacked supporting evidence, leading the court to conclude that the plaintiff was not entitled to the claimed share. The ad interim order was extended for four weeks. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236819 The court dismissed the notice of motion filed by the plaintiff as they failed to prove that the properties and businesses in question were joint Hindu family properties. The plaintiff could not establish a sufficient joint family nucleus for acquiring the properties or demonstrate that the businesses were initiated with joint family funds. Additionally, the plaintiff's claim for a 1/10th share lacked supporting evidence, leading the court to conclude that the plaintiff was not entitled to the claimed share. The ad interim order was extended for four weeks. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236819