<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 248 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236815</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeals by the parties and the department, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) orders regarding redemption fines and penalties as reasonable. The appellant-parties were allowed to file additional grounds and amend prayers, with no interference in the reduction of fines and penalties. The Tribunal affirmed the validity of orders of confiscation and penalties, emphasizing adherence to statutory limits and valuation considerations. The jurisdictional challenge was dismissed, and the Tribunal found no merit in claims regarding the applicability of the Foreign Trade Policy on photocopier machines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 10:28:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 248 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236815</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeals by the parties and the department, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) orders regarding redemption fines and penalties as reasonable. The appellant-parties were allowed to file additional grounds and amend prayers, with no interference in the reduction of fines and penalties. The Tribunal affirmed the validity of orders of confiscation and penalties, emphasizing adherence to statutory limits and valuation considerations. The jurisdictional challenge was dismissed, and the Tribunal found no merit in claims regarding the applicability of the Foreign Trade Policy on photocopier machines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>