<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 234 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld several decisions of the CIT(A), including disallowance of foreign traveling expenses, guest house expenses, loss in trading, excess consumption of Heptene and Catalysts, low yield and GP addition, and disallowance of interest on cash balance. However, issues regarding depreciation on assets leased back and deduction u/s 80HHC were set aside for re-examination. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, and the Assessee&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 07:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 234 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld several decisions of the CIT(A), including disallowance of foreign traveling expenses, guest house expenses, loss in trading, excess consumption of Heptene and Catalysts, low yield and GP addition, and disallowance of interest on cash balance. However, issues regarding depreciation on assets leased back and deduction u/s 80HHC were set aside for re-examination. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, and the Assessee&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>