https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236787 The case involved the denial of concessions under specific customs notifications, confirmation of differential duty and interest payment, confiscation of diverted goods, imposition of penalties on various individuals and entities, and a jurisdictional dispute over the appellate tribunal's venue. The Commissioner's order upheld the denial of concessions, confirmed the duty payment, and directed confiscation of diverted goods. Penalties were imposed on parties associated with SDV Steels Ltd. The tribunal ruled that the Chennai bench had jurisdiction for hearing the appeals due to the cause of action and relevant authorities being based there. The matter was referred to the Hon'ble President for a final decision on the venue for adjudication. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Sep 2013 13:50:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236787 The case involved the denial of concessions under specific customs notifications, confirmation of differential duty and interest payment, confiscation of diverted goods, imposition of penalties on various individuals and entities, and a jurisdictional dispute over the appellate tribunal's venue. The Commissioner's order upheld the denial of concessions, confirmed the duty payment, and directed confiscation of diverted goods. Penalties were imposed on parties associated with SDV Steels Ltd. The tribunal ruled that the Chennai bench had jurisdiction for hearing the appeals due to the cause of action and relevant authorities being based there. The matter was referred to the Hon'ble President for a final decision on the venue for adjudication. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236787