<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 207 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236774</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the issue of limitation, setting aside the impugned order due to lack of specific allegations and intentions to evade duty when invoking extended periods of limitation. The judgment emphasized the importance of clarity in show cause notices and specific justifications for extending limitation periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 12:51:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 207 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236774</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the issue of limitation, setting aside the impugned order due to lack of specific allegations and intentions to evade duty when invoking extended periods of limitation. The judgment emphasized the importance of clarity in show cause notices and specific justifications for extending limitation periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>