<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 205 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236772</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It found that the Assessee had made a bona fide estimate of taxable salary, complied with the Act&#039;s provisions, and that the AO&#039;s interpretation was narrow. The Tribunal noted the primary tax liability rests with the payee and in honest differences, the deductor should not be penalized. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 11:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 205 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236772</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It found that the Assessee had made a bona fide estimate of taxable salary, complied with the Act&#039;s provisions, and that the AO&#039;s interpretation was narrow. The Tribunal noted the primary tax liability rests with the payee and in honest differences, the deductor should not be penalized. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>