<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 204 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236771</link>
    <description>ITAT held that a bank guarantee constitutes a chargeable service and benefit to Associated Enterprises, so guarantee commission must be at arm&#039;s length; it rejected the assessee&#039;s stance, upheld CUP methodology but directed AO to compute guarantee commission at 0.5% (partly for Revenue). The tribunal ruled against the assessee on amortised entertainment software expenses for lack of verification by AO. Conversely, ITAT disallowed the TPO&#039;s addition for notional interest on overdue commercial balances (2.19% LIBOR) as unsustainable, finding LIBOR inappropriate for commercial overdues and deciding that the addition be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 16:44:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 204 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236771</link>
      <description>ITAT held that a bank guarantee constitutes a chargeable service and benefit to Associated Enterprises, so guarantee commission must be at arm&#039;s length; it rejected the assessee&#039;s stance, upheld CUP methodology but directed AO to compute guarantee commission at 0.5% (partly for Revenue). The tribunal ruled against the assessee on amortised entertainment software expenses for lack of verification by AO. Conversely, ITAT disallowed the TPO&#039;s addition for notional interest on overdue commercial balances (2.19% LIBOR) as unsustainable, finding LIBOR inappropriate for commercial overdues and deciding that the addition be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>