<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 196 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236763</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all five appeals of the Revenue and all four Cross Objections of the assessee. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, confirming that share application money does not fall under the purview of Section 2(22)(e) and that the exemption under Section 54F is applicable for investments in adjacent residential units used as a single residential house.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 196 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236763</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all five appeals of the Revenue and all four Cross Objections of the assessee. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, confirming that share application money does not fall under the purview of Section 2(22)(e) and that the exemption under Section 54F is applicable for investments in adjacent residential units used as a single residential house.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>