<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 193 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236760</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the disputed amounts for provident fund, repairs and maintenance, unrecovered amounts, depreciation on refinery, loss due to fire, devaluation of closing stock, telephone and vehicle expenses, and software purchase. The tribunal emphasized adherence to judicial principles and proper verification of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 193 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236760</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the disputed amounts for provident fund, repairs and maintenance, unrecovered amounts, depreciation on refinery, loss due to fire, devaluation of closing stock, telephone and vehicle expenses, and software purchase. The tribunal emphasized adherence to judicial principles and proper verification of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>