<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 185 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236752</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to value properties at Rs.2,500/- per cent for assessment years 1995-96 to 1998-99. The Court mandated the use of Schedule III for valuing a property at Kodaikanal, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument against its applicability. Additionally, the Court affirmed that wealth tax payable should be treated as a debt for calculating net wealth, despite amendments to the Wealth Tax Act. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for valuation based on Schedule III, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision on wealth tax treatment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 185 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236752</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to value properties at Rs.2,500/- per cent for assessment years 1995-96 to 1998-99. The Court mandated the use of Schedule III for valuing a property at Kodaikanal, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument against its applicability. Additionally, the Court affirmed that wealth tax payable should be treated as a debt for calculating net wealth, despite amendments to the Wealth Tax Act. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for valuation based on Schedule III, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision on wealth tax treatment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>