<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 181 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ordered the appellant, an insurance company, to pre-deposit Rs.50,00,000 within six weeks for denied CENVAT credit due to alleged fraudulent practices in claiming credit through tampered invoices. Compliance with this deposit was required before granting waiver and stay for the remaining amount of CENVAT credit, interest, and penalties. The decision emphasized the need for adherence to procedural and statutory requirements in claiming credits, distinguishing this case from previous instances where relief was granted to the same insurance company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 181 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ordered the appellant, an insurance company, to pre-deposit Rs.50,00,000 within six weeks for denied CENVAT credit due to alleged fraudulent practices in claiming credit through tampered invoices. Compliance with this deposit was required before granting waiver and stay for the remaining amount of CENVAT credit, interest, and penalties. The decision emphasized the need for adherence to procedural and statutory requirements in claiming credits, distinguishing this case from previous instances where relief was granted to the same insurance company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>