<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 173 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236740</link>
    <description>The vesting scheme under the Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1986 extended only to the textile undertakings and property appurtenant to them; Bungalow No. 2 of Swadeshi House was not shown to form part of that vested property. Earlier litigation had not established title in the appellant&#039;s favour, and the prior decision in Doypack did not decide the status of this bungalow. On that basis, the appellant could not sustain possession or eviction proceedings under the Swadeshi Act or the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act without first proving vesting or title.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 173 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236740</link>
      <description>The vesting scheme under the Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1986 extended only to the textile undertakings and property appurtenant to them; Bungalow No. 2 of Swadeshi House was not shown to form part of that vested property. Earlier litigation had not established title in the appellant&#039;s favour, and the prior decision in Doypack did not decide the status of this bungalow. On that basis, the appellant could not sustain possession or eviction proceedings under the Swadeshi Act or the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act without first proving vesting or title.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>