<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 172 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236739</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA granted waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty imposed on M/s C.P Re-rollers and the Director. The Tribunal found that the Department lacked corroborative evidence to establish clandestine removal of goods without duty payment. It concluded that the Applicants presented a strong prima facie case for waiver, leading to the waiver of all dues and a stay on recovery during the Appeal. Both parties were permitted to seek an early hearing due to the significant amount involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 172 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236739</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA granted waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty imposed on M/s C.P Re-rollers and the Director. The Tribunal found that the Department lacked corroborative evidence to establish clandestine removal of goods without duty payment. It concluded that the Applicants presented a strong prima facie case for waiver, leading to the waiver of all dues and a stay on recovery during the Appeal. Both parties were permitted to seek an early hearing due to the significant amount involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>