<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 153 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236720</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to adopt stamp duty valuation as the full consideration for computing capital gains under Section 50C. The Tribunal rejected arguments for a tolerance band and adjustments for time gaps, stating such provisions are not in the statute and must be addressed legislatively. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the correctness of the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 153 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236720</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to adopt stamp duty valuation as the full consideration for computing capital gains under Section 50C. The Tribunal rejected arguments for a tolerance band and adjustments for time gaps, stating such provisions are not in the statute and must be addressed legislatively. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the correctness of the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>