<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 147 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236714</link>
    <description>A finding that Gwar split purchases were intra-State and sham could not stand where the Tax Board relied on limited enquiry, sample transactions, and statements not tested through cross-examination or proper verification from the registered sellers. The HC held that tax authorities must conduct a meaningful enquiry and observe natural justice before drawing adverse conclusions from incriminating material. As the assessee had produced supporting documents and was denied a real opportunity to meet the evidence, the assessment orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 147 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236714</link>
      <description>A finding that Gwar split purchases were intra-State and sham could not stand where the Tax Board relied on limited enquiry, sample transactions, and statements not tested through cross-examination or proper verification from the registered sellers. The HC held that tax authorities must conduct a meaningful enquiry and observe natural justice before drawing adverse conclusions from incriminating material. As the assessee had produced supporting documents and was denied a real opportunity to meet the evidence, the assessment orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>