<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 140 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236707</link>
    <description>The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with court orders from both CESTAT and the High Court. The revenue department&#039;s failure to adhere to the orders led to directions for immediate compliance within two days, with a potential contempt of court notice if not followed. The case underscored the obligation of the revenue department to respect and implement judicial decisions promptly, highlighting the significance of upholding the rule of law in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 140 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236707</link>
      <description>The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with court orders from both CESTAT and the High Court. The revenue department&#039;s failure to adhere to the orders led to directions for immediate compliance within two days, with a potential contempt of court notice if not followed. The case underscored the obligation of the revenue department to respect and implement judicial decisions promptly, highlighting the significance of upholding the rule of law in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>