<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that compensation for non-routine AMP expenses was already included in the pricing arrangement with the AE, thus no additional compensation was necessary. The TPO was instructed to verify calculations and exclude certain expenses from the AMP calculation as directed by the DRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 124 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that compensation for non-routine AMP expenses was already included in the pricing arrangement with the AE, thus no additional compensation was necessary. The TPO was instructed to verify calculations and exclude certain expenses from the AMP calculation as directed by the DRP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>