<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 118 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236685</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of excess claim of remuneration based on the nature of the undisclosed income disclosed during the survey and in accordance with Section 40(b) of the IT Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 09:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 118 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236685</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of excess claim of remuneration based on the nature of the undisclosed income disclosed during the survey and in accordance with Section 40(b) of the IT Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>