<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 105 - Commissioner (Appeals)  Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236672</link>
    <description>The appellant, an Air Travel Agent, received incentives from CRS developers, contended to be taxable under &quot;Business Auxiliary Service.&quot; The Adjudicating Authority confirmed tax liability but dropped penalties under Section 77. The appellant argued for service tax liability under &quot;Air Travel Agents Service,&quot; not &quot;Business Auxiliary Service.&quot; The Commissioner ruled in favor of the appellant, stating the incentives were not taxable. No evidence of a service provider-receiver relationship or consideration for services was found. Precedents were cited to support the decision. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 105 - Commissioner (Appeals)  Chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236672</link>
      <description>The appellant, an Air Travel Agent, received incentives from CRS developers, contended to be taxable under &quot;Business Auxiliary Service.&quot; The Adjudicating Authority confirmed tax liability but dropped penalties under Section 77. The appellant argued for service tax liability under &quot;Air Travel Agents Service,&quot; not &quot;Business Auxiliary Service.&quot; The Commissioner ruled in favor of the appellant, stating the incentives were not taxable. No evidence of a service provider-receiver relationship or consideration for services was found. Precedents were cited to support the decision. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>