<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 90 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236657</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside previous orders due to procedural irregularities, lack of thorough investigation, and failure to adhere to principles of natural justice. The decision highlighted the importance of fair proceedings, proper verification of evidence, and the need for a transparent and comprehensive adjudication process to ensure justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 11:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 90 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236657</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside previous orders due to procedural irregularities, lack of thorough investigation, and failure to adhere to principles of natural justice. The decision highlighted the importance of fair proceedings, proper verification of evidence, and the need for a transparent and comprehensive adjudication process to ensure justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>