<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 87 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236654</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted relief to the assessee by reversing the disallowance of reimbursement expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act, emphasizing the non-profit nature of the payments. Regarding interest and administrative expenses, the Tribunal directed a de novo review due to the acceptance of additional evidence without the AO&#039;s assessment. The disallowance of prior period expenses was partially upheld, recognizing the expenses as allowable under Section 43B. The penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(C) was partly upheld by the CIT(A) but fully allowed by the Tribunal, stressing the need for substantiated claims to avoid inaccurate particulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 87 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236654</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted relief to the assessee by reversing the disallowance of reimbursement expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act, emphasizing the non-profit nature of the payments. Regarding interest and administrative expenses, the Tribunal directed a de novo review due to the acceptance of additional evidence without the AO&#039;s assessment. The disallowance of prior period expenses was partially upheld, recognizing the expenses as allowable under Section 43B. The penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(C) was partly upheld by the CIT(A) but fully allowed by the Tribunal, stressing the need for substantiated claims to avoid inaccurate particulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>