<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 83 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236650</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with various issues remanded to the assessing officer for fresh examination based on the Tribunal&#039;s detailed discussions. The Tribunal clarified that genuine purchases are still subject to disallowance under section 40A(3) and that the amendment by Finance Act 2008 is not retrospective. The decision was pronounced on 22.3.2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 83 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236650</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with various issues remanded to the assessing officer for fresh examination based on the Tribunal&#039;s detailed discussions. The Tribunal clarified that genuine purchases are still subject to disallowance under section 40A(3) and that the amendment by Finance Act 2008 is not retrospective. The decision was pronounced on 22.3.2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>