<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 76 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236643</link>
    <description>Amounts already recorded in the books of account or otherwise disclosed to the Department before the search cannot be treated as undisclosed income in block assessment proceedings. On that principle, cash withdrawals, chitty transactions, interest income, and peak bank deposits already reflected in returns, balance-sheets, cash flow statements, or trust records were not assessable as undisclosed income. Marriage gift receipts were reduced on partial donor evidence, while chit fund subscriptions and an LIC survival benefit claim were sent back for fresh verification. Surcharge under the block assessment provisions was held leviable under section 113. The overall result was mixed, with relief on several additions, remand on two items, and surcharge sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 07:57:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 76 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236643</link>
      <description>Amounts already recorded in the books of account or otherwise disclosed to the Department before the search cannot be treated as undisclosed income in block assessment proceedings. On that principle, cash withdrawals, chitty transactions, interest income, and peak bank deposits already reflected in returns, balance-sheets, cash flow statements, or trust records were not assessable as undisclosed income. Marriage gift receipts were reduced on partial donor evidence, while chit fund subscriptions and an LIC survival benefit claim were sent back for fresh verification. Surcharge under the block assessment provisions was held leviable under section 113. The overall result was mixed, with relief on several additions, remand on two items, and surcharge sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>