<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 49 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the gains from the sale of land should be treated as &quot;Capital Gains&quot; rather than &quot;Business Income.&quot; The deductions claimed under sections 54EC and 54F were allowed, as the gains were classified as capital gains. The Tribunal dismissed the issue regarding the sale consideration valuation, as relief had already been granted by the AO in a previous order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 09:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 49 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the gains from the sale of land should be treated as &quot;Capital Gains&quot; rather than &quot;Business Income.&quot; The deductions claimed under sections 54EC and 54F were allowed, as the gains were classified as capital gains. The Tribunal dismissed the issue regarding the sale consideration valuation, as relief had already been granted by the AO in a previous order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>