<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 48 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236615</link>
    <description>Reimbursement of salary and allied expenses for seconded employees was treated as non-taxable in the recipient&#039;s hands where the employees worked under the Indian company&#039;s control and tax had already been deducted under section 192 by the overseas employer; accordingly, no further deduction under section 195 arose and the related disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was deleted. The arrangement was also not regarded as fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) or Article 12(4)(b) of the India-Singapore DTAA. Reimbursement of professional fees required separate examination. In transfer pricing, comparability turned on functional similarity, risk profile, and reliable segmental analysis, and the investment advisory adjustment was deleted because the assessee&#039;s comparables were functionally acceptable and the margin was treated as arm&#039;s length.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 48 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236615</link>
      <description>Reimbursement of salary and allied expenses for seconded employees was treated as non-taxable in the recipient&#039;s hands where the employees worked under the Indian company&#039;s control and tax had already been deducted under section 192 by the overseas employer; accordingly, no further deduction under section 195 arose and the related disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was deleted. The arrangement was also not regarded as fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) or Article 12(4)(b) of the India-Singapore DTAA. Reimbursement of professional fees required separate examination. In transfer pricing, comparability turned on functional similarity, risk profile, and reliable segmental analysis, and the investment advisory adjustment was deleted because the assessee&#039;s comparables were functionally acceptable and the margin was treated as arm&#039;s length.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>