<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 46 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236613</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 2,60,020 due to a stock discrepancy but restricting the disallowance of interest to one percent of the total exempt income. The decision was based on the absence of a stock register and unreliable explanations provided by the assessee. The Tribunal referenced relevant cases to support its decision, emphasizing that practices aimed at inflating stock for obtaining higher loans cannot be accepted judicially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 46 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236613</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 2,60,020 due to a stock discrepancy but restricting the disallowance of interest to one percent of the total exempt income. The decision was based on the absence of a stock register and unreliable explanations provided by the assessee. The Tribunal referenced relevant cases to support its decision, emphasizing that practices aimed at inflating stock for obtaining higher loans cannot be accepted judicially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>