<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 38 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236605</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the first issue to the Assessing Officer for further verification regarding the nature of provisions. The second issue was decided in favor of the assessee, confirming that the contribution for PACS Manager salary was a statutory liability and allowable as an expenditure. The order was pronounced on 22-07-2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 38 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236605</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remanding the first issue to the Assessing Officer for further verification regarding the nature of provisions. The second issue was decided in favor of the assessee, confirming that the contribution for PACS Manager salary was a statutory liability and allowable as an expenditure. The order was pronounced on 22-07-2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>