<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 30 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling in favor of the applicant, holding that duty cannot be recovered from transferees if the DEPB scrip was validly issued but obtained fraudulently. The decision aligned with previous judgments, emphasizing the crucial distinction between forged and valid DEPB scrips in determining duty liability for importers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 30 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling in favor of the applicant, holding that duty cannot be recovered from transferees if the DEPB scrip was validly issued but obtained fraudulently. The decision aligned with previous judgments, emphasizing the crucial distinction between forged and valid DEPB scrips in determining duty liability for importers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>