<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 24 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236591</link>
    <description>The review applications were rejected as the Court found no error apparent on the face of the record. The Court upheld the findings of the Adjudicating Authority and the Tribunal, stating that no substantial question of law necessitated a review. The Court determined that the issues raised were questions of fact and not legal questions, thus dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 24 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236591</link>
      <description>The review applications were rejected as the Court found no error apparent on the face of the record. The Court upheld the findings of the Adjudicating Authority and the Tribunal, stating that no substantial question of law necessitated a review. The Court determined that the issues raised were questions of fact and not legal questions, thus dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>