<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 22 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236589</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied for a marginal shortage in the weight of H.R. coils where excise duty was paid on the full quantity by the manufacturer; a minor weight difference supported by debit notes did not justify reversal of credit, and the related duty, interest and penalty were set aside. Where the assessable value of final products increased, duty became payable on the revised value, so the demand, interest and penalty on the escalated amount were sustained. Penalty on the Director under Rule 26 was not justified in the absence of mala fides in a legal or technical dispute, and the personal penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 22 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236589</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied for a marginal shortage in the weight of H.R. coils where excise duty was paid on the full quantity by the manufacturer; a minor weight difference supported by debit notes did not justify reversal of credit, and the related duty, interest and penalty were set aside. Where the assessable value of final products increased, duty became payable on the revised value, so the demand, interest and penalty on the escalated amount were sustained. Penalty on the Director under Rule 26 was not justified in the absence of mala fides in a legal or technical dispute, and the personal penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>