<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 15 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236582</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was not justified. The income surrender by the assessee was voluntary, made to avoid litigation, and accepted by the Assessing Officer without adverse comments. The Tribunal found no evidence of concealment and concluded that the penalty imposed was unwarranted. As a result, the penalty was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 15 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236582</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was not justified. The income surrender by the assessee was voluntary, made to avoid litigation, and accepted by the Assessing Officer without adverse comments. The Tribunal found no evidence of concealment and concluded that the penalty imposed was unwarranted. As a result, the penalty was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>