https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236556 A one-time settlement was construed from the parties' correspondence and conduct as covering all pending disputes between the bank, the company, its directors and guarantors, not only the recovery proceeding but also the proceedings arising from the buy-back agreement. Acceptance of the settlement amount, issuance of the no dues certificate, and the absence of objection when connected matters were disposed of supported that comprehensive reading. On review, no error apparent on the face of the record or newly discovered material was shown, and a second review was barred under Order XLVII Rule 9 CPC. The review challenge therefore failed and no relief was granted. en-us Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236556 A one-time settlement was construed from the parties' correspondence and conduct as covering all pending disputes between the bank, the company, its directors and guarantors, not only the recovery proceeding but also the proceedings arising from the buy-back agreement. Acceptance of the settlement amount, issuance of the no dues certificate, and the absence of objection when connected matters were disposed of supported that comprehensive reading. On review, no error apparent on the face of the record or newly discovered material was shown, and a second review was barred under Order XLVII Rule 9 CPC. The review challenge therefore failed and no relief was granted. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236556