https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236555 Penalties under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC and Rule 26 were stated to be sustainable where duty was confirmed on clandestine removal and suppression. The text notes that payment of duty before issuance of the show cause notice did not, by itself, justify deletion of penalties when the duty demand had already been upheld. It further records that, because the Revenue had not challenged the quantum of penalty and the appellate interference was unsustainable, the original penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority were restored and upheld. en-us Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:26:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236555 Penalties under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC and Rule 26 were stated to be sustainable where duty was confirmed on clandestine removal and suppression. The text notes that payment of duty before issuance of the show cause notice did not, by itself, justify deletion of penalties when the duty demand had already been upheld. It further records that, because the Revenue had not challenged the quantum of penalty and the appellate interference was unsustainable, the original penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority were restored and upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236555