<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 845 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236553</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s denial of Cenvat credit for a fabricated structure was overturned by the Tribunal due to the demand being barred by limitation. The Tribunal considered the evolving legal landscape during the relevant period and found in favor of the appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the reduction of penalty by the Commissioner (Appeals), rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal to reinstate the original penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:25:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 845 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236553</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s denial of Cenvat credit for a fabricated structure was overturned by the Tribunal due to the demand being barred by limitation. The Tribunal considered the evolving legal landscape during the relevant period and found in favor of the appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the reduction of penalty by the Commissioner (Appeals), rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal to reinstate the original penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>