<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 824 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236532</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as they were based on a change of opinion without new facts or evidence, rendering the reassessment notice under Section 148 issued without jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, while the appeal filed by the AO was dismissed. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible material for reopening assessments and the prohibition against reassessment solely based on a change of opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 08:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 824 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236532</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as they were based on a change of opinion without new facts or evidence, rendering the reassessment notice under Section 148 issued without jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, while the appeal filed by the AO was dismissed. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible material for reopening assessments and the prohibition against reassessment solely based on a change of opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>