<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 819 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236527</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the tax department, partially allowing their appeals. The court upheld the disallowance of interest, valuation of perquisites, and addition of deemed dividends, emphasizing the need to prevent tax avoidance. However, the court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision to not club the income of the assessee&#039;s spouse with the assessee&#039;s income under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 819 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236527</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the tax department, partially allowing their appeals. The court upheld the disallowance of interest, valuation of perquisites, and addition of deemed dividends, emphasizing the need to prevent tax avoidance. However, the court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision to not club the income of the assessee&#039;s spouse with the assessee&#039;s income under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>