<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 812 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, remanding the main issues of transfer pricing adjustments back to the Transfer Pricing Officer for reconsideration. The claim for higher depreciation on computer peripherals was allowed based on relevant case law. The issue of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was deemed consequential and subject to the final outcome of the adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 812 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, remanding the main issues of transfer pricing adjustments back to the Transfer Pricing Officer for reconsideration. The claim for higher depreciation on computer peripherals was allowed based on relevant case law. The issue of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was deemed consequential and subject to the final outcome of the adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>