<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 807 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236515</link>
    <description>Exemption under Section 4A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 is confined to the fixed capital investment and period covered by the eligibility certificate, and exemption provisions must be strictly construed. Where a dealer later installs additional machinery and increases production, the benefit does not automatically extend to turnover from that enhanced production unless a fresh exemption claim is made under the prescribed procedure. Because the petitioners expanded production after the original certificate without obtaining a fresh certificate for the additional investment, they were not entitled to exemption on the resulting turnover, and the departmental circular and connected letter were upheld as consistent with the Act and notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 807 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236515</link>
      <description>Exemption under Section 4A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 is confined to the fixed capital investment and period covered by the eligibility certificate, and exemption provisions must be strictly construed. Where a dealer later installs additional machinery and increases production, the benefit does not automatically extend to turnover from that enhanced production unless a fresh exemption claim is made under the prescribed procedure. Because the petitioners expanded production after the original certificate without obtaining a fresh certificate for the additional investment, they were not entitled to exemption on the resulting turnover, and the departmental circular and connected letter were upheld as consistent with the Act and notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>