https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236506 The Tribunal upheld the misdeclaration of imported goods as "opal glassware dinner set" instead of "ceramic ware dinner set," resulting in the imposition of anti-dumping duty, fines, and penalties. The Commissioner (Appeals) modified penalties, setting aside the penalty on the director and reducing the importer's penalty. The order required re-export of the goods. The Tribunal directed the importer to deposit a specific sum within a timeframe, waiving predeposit upon compliance. The appeal process would determine if the misdeclaration was willful. The judgment ensured a fair process for addressing penalties and resolving the issues. en-us Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236506 The Tribunal upheld the misdeclaration of imported goods as "opal glassware dinner set" instead of "ceramic ware dinner set," resulting in the imposition of anti-dumping duty, fines, and penalties. The Commissioner (Appeals) modified penalties, setting aside the penalty on the director and reducing the importer's penalty. The order required re-export of the goods. The Tribunal directed the importer to deposit a specific sum within a timeframe, waiving predeposit upon compliance. The appeal process would determine if the misdeclaration was willful. The judgment ensured a fair process for addressing penalties and resolving the issues. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236506